30 Hour Sous-Vide Eye of Round Roast

Please welcome Mr. B for his first guest post on Bunkycooks.  I asked him to write about our experiences cooking with the PolyScience Sous Vide Professional Chef Series since he has been the scientist behind all the madness preparing and cooking foods by this method in our kitchen. He is the analytic and mathematician in our family, so who better to deal with the scientific aspects of cooking sous-vide than Mr. B?!

Sous-vide (cooking foods in a vacuum sealed bag at low temperatures in water) has become all the rage.  Most restaurant chefs and now many home cooks are discovering the benefits of this slow cook method.  Chef Anthony Lamas of Seviche, A Latin Restaurant, located in Louisville, Kentucky, recently said many people are using sous-vide just because it is the cool new kitchen tool.  He said that sous-vide has its place and it should be selectively used in situations where it will improve the food.

With that in mind, I decided to experiment with sous-vide.  I am a bit of an analytic so I knew I would come up with something that would appeal to engineers our readers and provide some very useful guidance.

One of the biggest benefits of sous-vide is that it allows you to slowly cook food to a precise temperature.  Its not over-cooked or under-cooked.  Cooking times are less precise as the food is brought to the exact temperature using the water circulator and then held at that temperature for as long as you leave it in the water bath.

Beef Eye of Round Roast ready to go in the sous-vide water bath

All foods have different cooking temperatures in sous-vide.  Here are the cooking temperatures for the water bath, which is also the final core temperature of the meat:

Short ribs                        medium                    140 degrees Fahrenheit
Roast Beef                        medium                    131 degrees Fahrenheit
Tenderloin                        medium                    142 degrees Fahrenheit
Port Tenderloin                   medium rare               140 degrees Fahrenheit
Salmon                            partially cooked          115 degrees Fahrenheit
Flounder                          medium                    117 degrees Fahrenheit
Chicken                                                     165 degrees Fahrenheit

Sous-vide allows you to precisely achieve and hold the specified temperature.  It is also easier to obtain very specific temperatures even up to 1/10 of one degree.  Can you imagine trying to check the core temperature of a piece of flounder?

The other advantage is the longer you slow cook certain meats, the more tender they will become as the cooking time breaks down the collagens (also known as the connective tissue) in the meat.  After all, if 24 hour short ribs are good, 72 hour short ribs must be better, right?  Well, that is what I wanted to find out.

I decided to test various cooking times to determine if there is a point where additional cooking no longer provides a more tender meat and if so, what is that cooking time.

Three packages of short ribs that will be cooked for three different times

The verdict:  Despite cooking the ribs 24, 48 or even 72 hours, the inside of the meat had a beautiful red center because of the sous-vide method.  However, there were some differences.  There is no question that cooking short ribs 24 hours in sous-vide provided a tender and perfectly cooked meat.  At 48 hours the ribs continued to become more tender, however, we noticed that they seemed a little drier.  At 72 hours the short ribs were definitely on the dry side.  Yes, they were very tender, but we found that they required a sauce to supplement what we perceived to be a loss of moisture.  This seemed odd since the meat is cooked in a sealed bag.  Why would the meat become drier if the moisture could not escape the bag?

Okay, this really got me excited had me intrigued.  A mystery to be solved.  So, with pencil and graph paper in hand, I headed to the internet to find the clues.

Short ribs that were cooked for 48 hours were more tender but seemed less moist

Short ribs cooked for 72 hours were very tender but were on the dry side

All of the short ribs were cooked to this temperature but the longer they cooked, the drier the meat became. Shown above, 24 hour sous-vide short ribs.

Very little has been written about this observation until I came across  a scientific site called SciVerse.  There is an article entitled “Physico-chemical, textural and structural characteristics of sous-vide cooked pork cheeks as affected by vacuum, cooking temperature, and cooking time.”  I just knew it was going to be filled with charts, graphs, facts and scientific references that most of us won’t understand I find fascinating.  Here is a link to the article if you want to numb your mind as well.

What I did learn from this article was that weight loss is lower and moisture content is higher the less the protein is cooked in the water bath.  Also, meat cooked above 70-80 degrees centigrade increases the toughness of the meat as the proteins change. (scientifically it is called miofibrilar coagulation).  Cooking longer periods of time, even at lower temperatures, resulted in more moisture loss.

I put this new found knowledge to the test on a beef eye of round roast.  I knew that cooking this roast in the oven produced a somewhat dry and tough piece of meat.  This cut of beef contains little fat and a lot of connective tissue; a perfect test for sous-vide (low fat, high connective tissue).  The meat was seasoned with salt and pepper and I added a mustard and garlic rub.

I quickly seared the meat, placed it in a vacuum bag for sealing and cooled it in a ice bath (this is an important step to kill any potential bacteria on the outside of the meat prior to cryovacing). It was vacuum sealed by a FoodSaver and then cooked by sous-vide method at 131 degrees Fahrenheit for 30 hours.  I believed this would provide sufficient time to break down the connective tissue and not dry out the protein.   After removing the meat from the vacuum sealed bag I seared it off in a skillet to provide color and texture.

Quickly sear the eye of round rubbed in mustard and seasoned with salt and pepper

Cool the temperature down in an ice bath before putting it in the sous-vide bath

One final quick sear gives it a nice brown exterior

The Results:  The beef eye of round was full of flavor and as tender as a tenderloin steak.  Clearly, the long and slow, low temperature sous-vide cooking method produced a very high quality result.  If I had continued to allow the eye of round to cook in the sous-vide water bath for another 24 to 48 hours it would result in loss of weight and a drier final product.

What you can learn from our experiments and research:

  1. Cooking sous-vide can make a dramatic difference in the quality of the final protein but choose wisely.  The biggest difference is in cuts of red meat that are typically low in fat and high in connective tissue.  We have also cooked fish with outstanding results which you can read about here.
  2. While you don’t have to be precise in the cooking time, you should be very precise in the cooking temperature.
  3. More is not always better.  If 24 hours is good, 72 hours is not necessarily better.  The longer you cook the protein the more it will dry out the meat, despite the juices being sealed in that vacuum bag.

* I undertook an additional experiment with lamb chops.  The recommended cooking time for 1-inch lamb chops is 2 hours at 140 degrees Fahrenheit.  Once again, 24 hours seemed to provide the best time to produce a more tender and moist chop.

Note:  Please be advised that you should exercise caution when cooking sous-vide.  Here are some food preparation tips.

DisclosurePolyScience has provided us with the Sous Vide Professional Chef Series for our review.

PrintPrint Recipe

sous vide-9

30 Hour Sous-Vide Eye of Round Roast

Yield: 6 servings

Prep Time: 15 minutes

Cook Time: 30 hours

Total Time: 30 hours, 15 minutes

Ingredients:

3 lb. beef eye of round roast
yellow mustard
Extra-virgin olive oil
1 1/2 tablespoons black pepper
1 1/2 tablespoons sea salt
3 cloves garlic, chopped

Directions:

1. Liberally apply yellow mustard, half of the salt and half of the pepper to the eye of round. In a hot skillet, quickly sear the outside of the roast in a little olive oil. Do not try to cook the roast. A quick searing will kill any bacteria that is on the outside.

2. Reapply a generous coating of yellow mustard and the remaining salt and pepper. Add chopped garlic to the outside of the roast and place the roast in a bag that will be used for vacuum sealing.

3. Place the unsealed bag in ice water for about 10 minutes. This is a required step in sous-vide to bring the temperature of the meat back down.

4. Seal the bag using a vacuum seal system. If there are juices in the bag, you might want to freeze the bag for 5 minutes prior to sealing. This process will help prevent the juices from being sucked up and out of the bag which could prevent a good, tight seal. Place the bag in a circulating bath of 131 degrees (medium). Allow to process for 24-30 hours.

5. Remove the roast from the bag. Again, sear the roast in a hot skillet to provide a pleasing finish. Slice and serve.

* All content on this site is copyrighted and all rights are reserved by Bunkycooks, On The Road culinary adventures, Image Press Photo and Riverbed Productions.  No content, written, photos or videos may be reproduced in whole or in part without express written permission.  Use the Contact form on the top of the Home Page to address any questions or requests.

18 Responses to “30 Hour Sous-Vide Eye of Round Roast”

  1. 1

    Susan in the Boonies — January 26, 2012 @ 1:54 pm

    I WONDERED what Mr. B. was going to post about!

    Great job, Mr. B.! I love me some good science with my food. Truly, I do! It’s why I love to read Cooks Illustrated: I want to know why and how!

    I wish I had a sous vide!

    • Gwen replied: — February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:17 pm

      Hi Susan,

      I also enjoy the science behind the Cooks Illustrated recipes. Mr. B is really into this stuff, so I am sure that’s why he is fascinated with the sous-vide.

      While he has made it quite scientific, you can also prepare foods quite simply by sous-vide method. It will be interesting to see if this becomes a fairly common kitchen item for home cooks.

      Gwen

  2. 2

    Jen at The Three Little Piglets — January 26, 2012 @ 4:44 pm

    What a great experiment! I was hoping when I started culinary school I’d get to play around with it a little, but they don’t have the equipment to do it. Maybe one day…

    • Gwen replied: — February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:18 pm

      Hi Jen,

      This would be a perfect tool for a cooking school, depending on what you are learning. I do hope that you have the chance to use one someday to see the difference in the way it can prepare foods.

      Gwen

  3. 3

    Maureen — January 27, 2012 @ 8:18 am

    I want one !! This is a way cool piece of equipment.

  4. 4

    Marie — January 28, 2012 @ 3:04 pm

    First, I have to say, “What Susan in the Boonies said”!
    Loved this article, the photos and descriptions made me drool and crave meat (though I am vegan!). Really liked the descriptions. Great article. Hope Mr. B comes back for another guest spot.
    And, one more: Is there a way that I can get on your list for your leftovers? :-)

    • Gwen replied: — February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:20 pm

      Hi Marie,

      We are happy to share leftovers! We always seem to have way too much food since there are just two of us and all of this cooking.

      I am sure Mr. B will be back for another guest post. A girl needs a break sometimes, so I am happy to let him fill in. :-)

      Gwen

  5. 5

    Christine @ Fresh Local and Best — January 29, 2012 @ 7:34 pm

    Boy you have a taken a cutting edge cooking technique to new levels. I had no idea that you sous vide required so much time. Even more surprising is that it bodes well for those looking to consume leaner meats. Maybe sous vide will make leaner cuts more trendy. The results must be amazing.

    • Gwen replied: — February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:23 pm

      Hi Christine,

      Yes, cooking meats takes a bit of time, but as you can see, the results are pretty spectacular. Other foods, like fish, can be prepared much quicker. See this post about Sous-Vide Salmon http://www.bunkycooks.com/2011/09/sous-vide-salmon-polyscience-sous-vide-professional/.

      We have tried some veggies and a few other dishes. I am sure Mr. B will be back with another post and some additional recipes.

      Gwen

  6. 6

    Jamie — January 30, 2012 @ 8:15 am

    Actually, this is all quite fascinating… your experiments taught me things I never would have thought of. I would have imagined that sous-vide would keep the moisture in but I never thought of the changing chemical reactions. Cool! I love Mr. B as guest poster: he’s funny and informative and the food looks delicious! Come back again soon, Mr. B!

    • Gwen replied: — February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:26 pm

      Hi Jamie,

      I am sure that Mr. B will be back soon and I am glad that you enjoyed his post. :-)

      It is fun to learn about the chemical reasons why the meats turn out the way they do. We never knew preparing food in a hot water bath could be so technical, huh?!

      Gwen

  7. 7

    Lisa — January 30, 2012 @ 8:36 am

    You’ve gone molecular! Well..Mr. B has. I love it! I’ve been dying to try the sous vide method, but the equipment is just too expensive. However, I think that’s the best looking roast and short ribs I’ve ever seen! Perfectly pink and juicy! Well done, Mr. Bunky!

    • Gwen replied: — February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:28 pm

      Hi Lisa,

      Thank you for your comment. Yes, Mr. B has gone mad scientist. It’s been very interesting getting to try all foods prepared sous-vide.

      We have more experiments planned, so stay tuned!

      Gwen

  8. 8

    Devaki @ weavethousandflavors — January 31, 2012 @ 6:40 pm

    What an excellent post by Mr. B. Watch out Gwen Mr. B’s gonna give you a run for your money in the kitchen :)

    I have no experience with sous vide but see that it has become all the rage on blogs, restaurants, everywhere.

    chow :) Devaki @ weavethousandflavors

    • Gwen replied: — February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:30 pm

      Hi Devaki,

      Yes, sous-vide has become very popular. Not everything is made better by cooking this method, but I know that chefs and home cooks are trying all sorts of things out in the circulator.

      As you can see, it definitely has the ability to improve certain cuts of beef and we are definitely sold on that along with a few other meats and seafood.

      Mr. B will be back for sure!

      Gwen

  9. 9

    sippitysup — February 3, 2012 @ 10:47 am

    We have been playing with sous vide on our desert weekends as friends got a machine. The results are great, but I am not completely sold. It lacks a little heart and soul for my tastes! After all I love cooking. GREG

    • Gwen replied: — February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:12 pm

      Hi Greg,

      Mr. B has done much of the cooking with the sous-vide (as you can tell). I do enjoy the results, particularly with meats, but I also like the old fashioned way of cooking, too. It is nice when having company to be able to keep things at a steady temp without overcooking. I do like that feature.

      Gwen

  10. 10

    Baker Street — February 13, 2012 @ 6:49 am

    Super experiment I say! Looks absolutely divine.

Leave a Comment